I am starting to get more involved in ppl and noticed some things in the newsitngo code. I know ppl isn't the greatest language in syntax nor function. I wrote a more functional language and parser/compiler as a term project way back in college but not for poker. Anyway, I have noticed conflicting situations in the ppl. I know this language is very limited due to its sequential nature but I just wanted to ask if your intent was to have shortstack code supercede bubble code. I have seen the bot call shoves in bubble situations where there was 3 players (bot included) of equal size and one player of really small stack that you have coded to fold in the bubble code but the short stack code overrides it because the 3 even size stacks just barely qualify for your short stack code and it precedes the bubble code. Since I'm new to this language and not the originator of the code I just wanted to know your intent. I have modified it temporarily but value your thought.

Thanks

ooooh good catch

very good catch
i will take care of this today

i am also releasing a new version of simplestrat today

jj1002 wrote:I am starting to get more involved in ppl and noticed some things in the newsitngo code. I know ppl isn't the greatest language in syntax nor function. I wrote a more functional language and parser/compiler as a term project way back in college but not for poker. Anyway, I have noticed conflicting situations in the ppl. I know this language is very limited due to its sequential nature but I just wanted to ask if your intent was to have shortstack code supercede bubble code. I have seen the bot call shoves in bubble situations where there was 3 players (bot included) of equal size and one player of really small stack that you have coded to fold in the bubble code but the short stack code overrides it because the 3 even size stacks just barely qualify for your short stack code and it precedes the bubble code. Since I'm new to this language and not the originator of the code I just wanted to know your intent. I have modified it temporarily but value your thought.

Thanks

HOW the f**K have we missed that nice work, thanks for sharing it.

webber04 wrote:very good catch
i will take care of this today

i am also releasing a new version of simplestrat today

Thanks, I don't know how you guys do it. PPL gives me a headache! To try to imbue that level of intelligence to the bot using sequentially read conditional statements that can only be two levels deep is difficult or at least very tedious. Add to that the design environment, or lack of, and you guys are simply amazing! There are variations of the above mentioned conflicts too but your new version may have taken care of it.

Guys and girls, I been hitting 1st and seconds a whole lot more now.....WTG jj!

Web, you need to reward him somehow....this was a biggie.

ok i am going to reset the input form

plz everyone enter your results