by snapperhead on Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am***** Hand History for Game *****
Tourney Hand NL Texas Hold'em -
Table 2 025 Sit Go () Table 1 (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Villian ( $2010.00 USD )
Seat 5: P2 ( $3010.00 USD )
Seat 6: P3 ( $4750.00 USD )
Seat 9: Hero ( $3730.00 USD )
P3 posts small blind [$400.00 USD].
Hero posts big blind [$800.00 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ 7d 4c ]
Villian raises [$2010.00 USD]
P2 folds
P3 folds
Hero calls [$1210.00 USD]
Villian shows [Kh, 9h ]
Hero shows [7d, 4c ]
** Dealing Flop ** [ Qd, 9s, 6h ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Qh ]
** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
Villian wins $4420.00 USD from main pot
Personally I would lay this down
Last edited by snapperhead on Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Is this a correct call here??
snapperhead- Posts: 69
Join date: 2009-05-02
jdaces- Posts: 54
Join date: 2009-05-03
need the bot log. u may have been big bling and the blinds were high therefore short stack and pot committed etc.
webber04
- Posts: 1592
Join date: 2009-04-30
Age: 30
yeah i would love to see the botlog
cause i think there is a fix to this
cause i think there is a fix to this
_________________
Webber
mrpokerman- Super User
- Posts: 132
Join date: 2009-07-18
probably because your stack fell below 5bb so it triggered the all in.
snapperhead- Posts: 69
Join date: 2009-05-02
under short stack strategy section of code.
3rd code block in made the Pre Flop call.
currently we call if
1. in big blind
2. opponent is all in
3. betsize <= 2
4. only 1 opponent
if our stack size was bigger (maybe >=7) a Pre Flop call here would be OK. chance to knock him out and still be kinda OK stackwise.
3rd code block in made the Pre Flop call.
currently we call if
1. in big blind
2. opponent is all in
3. betsize <= 2
4. only 1 opponent
if our stack size was bigger (maybe >=7) a Pre Flop call here would be OK. chance to knock him out and still be kinda OK stackwise.
snapperhead- Posts: 69
Join date: 2009-05-02
mrpokerman wrote:probably because your stack fell below 5bb so it triggered the all in.
no - not on this hamd
webber04- Posts: 1592
Join date: 2009-04-30
Age: 30
800 bb * 5 = 4000
your stacksize = 3730
so yes it did fall behind 5 bb
it still was not the correct play however
and i am fixing it now
your stacksize = 3730
so yes it did fall behind 5 bb
it still was not the correct play however
and i am fixing it now
_________________
Webber
snapperhead- Posts: 69
Join date: 2009-05-02
webber04 wrote:800 bb * 5 = 4000
your stacksize = 3730
so yes it did fall behind 5 bb
it still was not the correct play however
and i am fixing it now
yes i understand that - but i was saying it did not raisemax all in because it was <5 - it made a call because of the short stack code i mentioned.
cheers
webber04- Posts: 1592
Join date: 2009-04-30
Age: 30
yep i see what u mean
anyhow
i am fixing it regardless
anyhow
i am fixing it regardless
_________________
Webber
snapperhead- Posts: 69
Join date: 2009-05-02
webber04 wrote:yep i see what u mean
anyhow
i am fixing it regardless
hi web
any progress?
webber04- Posts: 1592
Join date: 2009-04-30
Age: 30
but
some but still working on it
some but still working on it
_________________
Webber